CitroJim wrote:myglaren wrote:
The SAAB/Volvo system of way back always seemed to me to be quite adequate.
Agreed, an excellent idea, as was dim-dip...
Agree, Dim/Dip was very good, I remember the days when everybody flashed at Volvos because they thought they left their lights on
!
Stickyfinger wrote:
I disagree with the DRL ban however. I find them, if fitted/designed correctly, to be an excellent fitting given the number of total spanners that do not put their bloody lights on till its nearly impossible to see them !
Well there you have it. Fitted/designed correctly they're fine but in the vast majority of cases they're not. I'd be all for them if they used the old Volvo/SAAB scheme as spoken of by Steve.. On a lot of vehicles they look hideous and silly. There's a German car that appears to have lights inspired by goat’s eyes. Maybe attractive to goats but not to me.
HEY !, some Goats I know are quite pretty !
Perhaps it's my eyes but the vast majority of DRLs blind and dazzle me. That's dangerous. The best I've seen are on some Fiat 500s where they appear to be dimmed foglights. They're good and perfectly functional/adequate for their intended purpose.
I agree again, if they dazzel then they are badly designed, if too bright, badly designed or bad bulb upgrade.
As for style, mate we are old before we know it : and soon bell bottom flairs will be back and you will be doing up your 8 button waist band and looking out your Red Kickers !
If they help me see the idiot coming, then I am happy, if I get dazzled by poor design or by poor "styling" I can only hope that standards will improve but I have still seen them !
this guy talks some sense
http://www.danielsternlighting.com/tech ... d/bad.html" onclick="window.open(this.href);return false;