A couple of months back, I picked up a Minolta 7000 from a local photography store, sadly this turned out to have a fault which rendered the aperture control inoperative. It's stuck at somewhere around f/4 - with this lens on anyway. The mechanism to operate it does move, but the preload is way out of whack. It's an odd one and I could absolutely see why they wouldn't have spotted it when doing a basic function check.
Now bear in mind, I paid a whole £20 for this, and fully expected this to be very much sold as seen. I asked the shop I got it from if they knew anyone who might be willing to take a look. Cue much apologising, and the camera being whisked off to not one, but three different repairers. Eventually the conclusion being reached that it's BER. There's a spare part needed which you're only going to get by cannibalising another camera, and there's a stupid amount of work involved because it's so deeply buried. I was offered two choices. Another very cosmetically scruffy but thoroughly tested and working 7000, or a tidy 7000i at no extra charge.
I took the scruffy 7000. While from a purely logical standpoint that makes zero sense, I just prefer it. Plus while I do try to look after them, I do like to actually use my cameras and don't baby them overly much - so don't really mind it being a bit scruffy. Especially when I've only paid £20 for it!
I still have the clean one as well, if for instance I wind up with a fixed aperture lens of some sort in the future it could still be used.
Absolutely cannot compliment the service at Imagex enough.
Also on the subject of photography, I've run into something of a hard limit with my current hardware regarding photos for my website. In recent history I've used my phone, which does punch well above it's weight. I mean this is straight out the gate without me doing anything aside from some cropping.
What limits me however for things like this...
...Is a serious lack of depth of field. This is down to a physical limitation of the camera here and that's the fact that the aperture is fixed at f/1.6. Which is fair enough...the fact that Huawei managed to cram as much capability into this small a package is downright astonishing.
However it's time to admit I need something a bit more suited to the job at hand. Believe it or not, despite all the cameras I own a DSLR is not among them. Now I could roll the dice on something on eBay etc...or the aforementioned photography shop have said they can fix me up with a Canon EOS 40D, a decent 50mm Prime lens and a big battery kit for £150. I reckon that will suit my needs just fine, and while it may cost me an extra £50 over eBay, makes me feel good about supporting a local business I've really come to like.
Yes the 40D is only 10MP, but for my needs that's absolutely adequate. Especially as I'll usually be close enough to the subject that I'll not be doing a massive amount of cropping anyway. This isn't something I'll be taking out to car shows, Goodwood or Furcons, in those settings I'll likely either be letting Chris get the photos with his few grand of Canon something-about-a-year-old and a grand or so of glass or if it's me I'll be shooting on film for my part.
He gets stuff where you can count the driver's facial hairs as they go up the hill at Goodwood. I get this instead.
Exactly what I was after - something which looked like it could have come straight out of an automotive publication from the 60s. I really want to get a shot of the Napier Railton in motion on that film (Ilford Delta 3200) one day. That is a crop in on a frame just shot on a 50mm lens by the way, no fancy telephoto kit here. That was shot on the old Konica T3.
Here's one from your old Olympus from last September, Jim.
Which is still my usual go to camera these days, especially since it was kitted out with the manual adapter a year or so back.
So I suspect we may have some new tech arriving in the next week or so for me to get to grips with...then I'll be a little more inclined to get the next few pages for the site put together. Hopefully with slightly sharper images.