aerodynamica wrote: ↑03 Oct 2024, 21:50
steveclv wrote: ↑03 Oct 2024, 11:05
Almost certainly the right hand sphere has failed. As the gas pressure reduces, a spiked ring inside penetrates the rubber diaphragm causing it to 'explode'. LDS leaks into the sphere and that corner of the car drops. At the lowest suspension setting you should see LDS at the bottom of the tank - you don't because the LDS is now inside the sphere.
There is no leakage from the car when this happens, just a loud bang and the corner of the car drops.
I suggest that you change at least both front spheres.
Regarding the height - the height sensor is on the left hand side - it does not measure both sides.
Sorry, the height sensor measures the both sides by averaging the two sides by the position of the anti roll bar. The left side location of the height sensor is incidental because the clamp it attaches to on the anti roll bar is at or near the middle of the anti roll bar. Same at the rear. It has been this way since the very first DS in 1955.
And further, as had been said: a failed sphere on one side will not cause the car to drop on one side. The fluid pressure is equalised across the axle Left to right so any loss of gas pressure in a sphere (whether sudden or not) will affect both left and right side hight. That is until the height adjusting system detects a height change and adds more fluid to raise the height.
I really think this car in the o.p has suffered a physical, structural failure. Just remains to find out what it is.
I'm no mechanic but I do have some physics knowledge and it would be strange and damaging if the suspension work, as you claim , in tandem. That would mean the suspension would act the same way when only one wheel went into a hole, making the whole car jump.
After reading up the last couple of days it has been claimed, by way more knowledgeable people than me in this and other forums, that the later hydraulic systems are one way, not sircular, and that a leak or damaged to the system does not empty the other parts of it, unlike the older versions.
The claim is that the system in total has lost available lds fluid, but mostly on the part where the "leak" came about.
This supposed "structural damage" you keep talking about seems way more far fetched considering there are no symptoms what so ever supporting them (no visible damage, no leaks, the hydraulic system still functions, the pump works, there are no relevant errors in diagbox supporting this, and so on). Your hypothesis also don't explain where the loss in lds fluid has disappeared , while the blown sphere gives a total loss of 0,5 liters and fits perfectly.