Great to hear of your success Owen
How long has it been since you did this mod ?
It sounds like you were very thorough in ruling out all other possibilities first (spheres, sticky height correctors, electrovalves, diode mod etc) to no avail - much like me with my previous
Xantia a number of years ago where I did all that but even went as far as replacing the rear
suspension arm bearings, (which turned out to be fine!) and front struts (whose shafts were worn through the hardening at the normal ride height position) and still had intermittent severe ride harshness over broken surfaces until I started experimenting with the air bubble issue.
Although I never got that
Xantia 100% (I don't think the U-tube I fitted works as well as just cutting the pipe short, and there may have been other issues) when I did the mod on my current
Xantia the ride was velvety smooth and completely free of harshness for three months straight, but then started to deteriorate again as a slight air leak on the inlet hose near the pump manifested. (Visible weeping of oil at the joint) I replaced and tightened the clamp and the ride was smooth again for about 6 weeks then started getting worse again, and once again the joint is weeping slightly.
I've just ordered some new hopefully better fitting hose and I'm tempted to at least temporarily as a test replace the entire length from tank to pump as one piece - on the V6 the pump spigot is the same diameter as the tank spigot so one length of 12.7mm ID hose should work without needing a size step down joiner. It will be interesting to see if it is indeed an air leak that made the ride get so bad recently, its got bad enough that I thought the front spheres were shot.
Interesting you say that the ride on your Hydractive car was so much worse than the SX - although the standard models can suffer from air bubbles as well (cc101's car is not Hydractive) I'm pretty sure that the Hydractive models are more prone to harsh ride due to air bubbles for a few reasons.
One is there is a lot more pipe length and diameter between the struts and height corrector - so far more oil volume and piping for bubbles to get caught in - and it's less able to self bleed when the
suspension is lowered. (The air bubbles have to be forced all the way from the struts to the height corrector to bleed, the long, large diameter pipes on the Hydractive take a much larger flow volume to push that air all the way through to the height corrector)
The second is that I think the wheel oscillation that naturally occurs when you hit a broken surface causes the large pipes that run from the front strut tops along the wings down to the hydractive regulator to "hammer" against the chassis, passing the shock into the body. Especially if the pipes are not bolted to the wing properly or the steel pipe is out of its plastic guides. (Especially under the battery mount)
The final one is that I think enough air does actually start to cause the hydractive control block to malfunction - instead of staying locked in hard or soft mode as directed by the electrovalve I think it will sometimes chatter back and forth with
suspension oscillation since the control pressure from the electrovalve is not completely incompressible when laced with air.
If the valve is bouncing back and forth between soft and hard positions 10-15 times a second during a "wheel hop" oscillation, (self resonance of the
suspension springing and axle/wheel mass - typically around 10-15 Hz) that would transmit a very significant repetitive jolt into the
suspension/chassis during each wheel oscillation.
By the way I've only driven in Edinburgh a few times but the potholes can't be worse than those in parts of Glasgow - entire cars can fall into potholes here and go missing for days...